MBOX-Line: From dinh.viet.hoa at gmail.com Mon Mar 9 21:35:53 2015 To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu From: "Hoa V. DINH" Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:34:54 -0000 Subject: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different? In-Reply-To: References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com> <54FBF289.3010202@psaux.com> <7164.1425831184@parc.com> <1425907661.1215497.237833469.1EDA571D@webmail.messagingengine.com> <6506.1425915329@parc.com> <7782A916-12BB-488C-BD57-697FDB5D47E2@orthanc.ca> <0C18524D-28EC-4DF9-A888-678E7DD4E56A@orthanc.ca> Message-ID: <26AB3DC45CA940E1B88C705DA21772DA@gmail.com> Please go ahead. (Btw, text protocol doesn?t seem to be an issue with chat app (FYI they use jabber, which is a verbose protocol using XML)) -- Hoa V. DINH On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Imants Cekusins wrote: > Let's take chat messages as an example. They are fast. much faster > than email, aren't they? Why? Isn't it a similar concept: text > (transmitted as bytes) flowing from one browser to another - via an > intermediate server? > > Web servers are getting more efficient, databases are getting more efficient. > > Why not bring email servers up to speed? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: