MBOX-Line: From janssen at parc.com  Sun Mar 11 20:56:51 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Bill Janssen <janssen@parc.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:34:38 -0000
Subject: [Imap-protocol] mailbox hierarchy conventions? 
In-Reply-To: <1173661726.17598.331.camel@hurina> 
References: <07Mar11.154843pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
	<alpine.OSX.0.83.0703111704450.20984@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<07Mar11.162448pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
	<alpine.OSX.0.83.0703111726370.20984@pangtzu.panda.com>
	<1173661726.17598.331.camel@hurina>
Message-ID: <07Mar11.195659pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>

Thanks, that's a nice list.

> One workaround that there used to be was that several clients (kmail,
> Thunderbird at least) didn't like if UID field wasn't the first field in
> FETCH replies. After a while I gave up and just put it back to begin
> first.

Didn't like it, how?  I'm sending it last (on a UID FETCH if it's not
explicitly specified), and Thunderbird seems happy.  I send the specified
items on a FETCH in the order they were requested.

Bill