mailing list archives

meli community discussions

⚠️ if something does not work as intended when interracting with the mailing lists,
reach out Github mirror Gitea repo @epilys:matrix.org

[Imap-protocol] CONDSTORE RFC typo

E-mail headers
From: Hoà V. Dinh <dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com>
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:34:50 -0000
Message-ID: D5C2D620280948758A0A23AA6E73314C@gmail.com permalink / raw / eml / mbox 
Hi IMAPers,

In the ABNF definition of CONDSTORE (RFC 4551), here what we can read for the extension of resp-text-code.

   resp-text-code      =/ "HIGHESTMODSEQ" SP mod-sequence-value /
                          "NOMODSEQ" /
                          "MODIFIED" SP set

I think we should we rather read the following:

   resp-text-code      =/ "HIGHESTMODSEQ" SP mod-sequence-value /
                          "NOMODSEQ" /
                          "MODIFIED" SP sequence-set


RFC 1730 and RFC 2060 mentioned "set". It's been changed to sequence-set in RFC 3501.
Therefore, I think the same name should be applied in RFC 4551.

--  
Ho? V. Dinh

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20130228/0f4e70f8/attachment.html>
Reply
E-mail headers
From: dave@cridland.net
To: imap-protocol@localhost
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:34:50 -0000
Message-ID: CAKHUCzx08_5zLUJLxkW0EZVdXv0FYiTJERdAWT7g8AqtDJsXfQ@mail.gmail.com permalink / raw / eml / mbox 
On Feb 28, 2013 5:24 PM, "Ho? V. Dinh" <dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com> wrote:
> RFC 1730 and RFC 2060 mentioned "set". It's been changed to sequence-set
in RFC 3501.
> Therefore, I think the same name should be applied in RFC 4551.

I agree - thankfully it's quite minor. You want to submit an errata?

Dave.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20130301/2cbfd7dc/attachment.html>
Reply
E-mail headers
From:
To: imap-protocol@localhost
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:34:50 -0000
Message-ID: DEFFB11078934EB287BB19A259C0B3D6@gmail.com permalink / raw / eml / mbox 
On Friday, March 1, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>  
>  
> On Feb 28, 2013 5:24 PM, "Ho? V. Dinh" <dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com (mailto:dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > RFC 1730 and RFC 2060 mentioned "set". It's been changed to sequence-set in RFC 3501.
> > Therefore, I think the same name should be applied in RFC 4551.
>  
>  
> I agree - thankfully it's quite minor. You want to submit an errata?
>  
>  
> Dave.
>  
>  
>  

Here you go: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4551&eid=3506

--  
Ho? V. Dinh

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20130301/75309cb9/attachment.html>
Reply
E-mail headers
From: barryleiba@computer.org
To: imap-protocol@localhost
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:34:50 -0000
Message-ID: CAC4RtVCYS0zfDfEuM-ALQ3_DwYNtzXuTe0OgKiFamXW0P059Rw@mail.gmail.com permalink / raw / eml / mbox 
>
>
> > RFC 1730 and RFC 2060 mentioned "set". It's been changed to sequence-set
> in RFC 3501.
> > Therefore, I think the same name should be applied in RFC 4551.
>
> I agree - thankfully it's quite minor. You want to submit an errata?
>
>  Here you go:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4551&eid=3506
>

Thanks... and I've marked it as "Verified".

Barry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20130301/4d0c9688/attachment.html>
Reply