Ok Jan, I understand what you mean but the problem comes from the missed
RFC822.
The server does not send it, why?
2014-07-30 15:50 GMT+02:00 Jan Kundr?t <jkt@flaska.net>:
> On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 15:20:06 CEST, Davide Gullo wrote:
>
>> 29.07.14 17:07 >>> >>>>>>> send >>>>>>
>> 29.07.14 17:07 >>> 5 UID FETCH 7848:7853 (UID X-GM-MSGID FLAGS RFC822.SIZE
>> ENVELOPE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (References)] BODYSTRUCTURE RFC822)
>> 29.07.14 17:07 >>> >>>>>>> end send >>>>>>
>> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< <<<<<<< read <<<<<<
>> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< * 1 FETCH (X-GM-MSGID 1345148067064026772 UID 7848
>> RFC822.SIZE 1372 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (References)] {2}
>> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< <<<<<<< end read <<<<<<
>> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< <<<<<<< read <<<<<<
>> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< <<<<<<< end read <<<<<<
>> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< <<<<<<< read <<<<<<
>>
>
> I don't see any problem in this log. Chances are that your client's IMAP
> parser does not properly support literals. Please note that the server says
> that the "BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (References)]" item which you are fetching
> contains exactly two bytes, the CR followed by LF. In C-syntax, that would
> be "\r\n".
>
> So this is how the data sent by the server look like on the wire (again,
> using the C-style escaping of non-printable character):
>
> BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (References)] {2}\r\n\r\n)\r\n
>
> Let's break it down:
>
> 1) "BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (References)]" -- that's an identification what
> you're about to read.
>
> 2) SP (a space, " ") -- delimiter, as defined by the FETCH response format
>
> 3) "{2}\r\n" -- this means that a LITERAL follows. The overal size of the
> literal is two bytes. You *must* stop reading in a line-oriented manner
> right now, and switch to reading the exact number of bytes which the server
> tells you -- two bytes in this case.
>
> 4) "\r\n", i.e. CR LF -- actual header data. The header is missing, so the
> server sends just the CR LF which is the separator between the header and
> the body of a MIME message.
>
> 5) ")" -- consitutes the end of the FETCH response data
>
> 6) CR LF -- end of the line, end of the response
>
> Let's see it in action:
>
>
> BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (References)] {2}
>> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< <<<<<<< end read <<<<<<
>>
>
> ...at this point you know it's a literal. You should switch from
> read-until-end-of-line mode into reading-number-of-binary-bytes mode right
> now, and read two bytes in that mode.
>
>
> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< <<<<<<< read <<<<<<
>> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< <<<<<<< end read <<<<<<
>>
>
> Your code silently ignores CR LF line ends. You have a bug right here.
>
> OK, you've read two bytes, you should switch to the standard mode of
> reading until EOL:
>
>
> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< <<<<<<< read <<<<<<
>> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< )
>> 29.07.14 17:07 <<< <<<<<<< end read <<<<<<
>>
>
> Right, end of response, everything is OK.
>
> Cheers,
> Jan
>
> --
> Trojit?, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imap-protocol mailing list
> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
>
--
Davide Gullo, Consulente Web (professionista disciplinato ai sensi della
legge 4/2013)
http://www.m4ss.net
gullo@m4ss.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20140730/96dab94d/attachment.html>