mailing list archives

meli community discussions

⚠️ if something does not work as intended when interracting with the mailing lists,
reach out Github mirror Gitea repo @epilys:matrix.org

E-mail headers
From: Bill Janssen <janssen@parc.com>
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:34:39 -0000
Message-ID: 07Mar26.161925pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com permalink / raw / eml / mbox
And more...  Is there an RFC for command pipelining?

Bill

------- Forwarded Message

Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 13:18:08 PDT
To: Bill Janssen <janssen@parc.com>
Subject: Re: [Imap-protocol] IMAP features: which clients use them?
From: Brendan Cully <brendan@kublai.com>

mutt also supports idle, ssl and starttls.

command pipelining might be worth adding -- like IDLE, it tends to
exercise the darker corners of some servers. Mutt does this too.


------- End of Forwarded Message
Reply
E-mail headers
From: MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU
To: imap-protocol@localhost
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:34:39 -0000
Message-ID: alpine.WNT.0.83.0703261722130.5600@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU permalink / raw / eml / mbox
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Bill Janssen wrote:
> And more...  Is there an RFC for command pipelining?

It's described in the base specification.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
Reply
E-mail headers
From: janssen@parc.com
To: imap-protocol@localhost
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:34:39 -0000
Message-ID: 07Mar26.164446pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com permalink / raw / eml / mbox
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Bill Janssen wrote:
> > And more...  Is there an RFC for command pipelining?
> 
> It's described in the base specification.

Apparently not by that name...

Bill
Reply
E-mail headers
From: MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU
To: imap-protocol@localhost
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:34:39 -0000
Message-ID: alpine.WNT.0.83.0703261745310.5600@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU permalink / raw / eml / mbox
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Bill Janssen wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Bill Janssen wrote:
>>> And more...  Is there an RFC for command pipelining?
>> It's described in the base specification.
> Apparently not by that name...

RFC 3501 section 5.5.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
Reply